Sunday, 27 November 2016

Into Thin Air: Chapter 1-7 (Reader Response Theory)

Into Thin Air is adventure writer and journalist Jon  Krakauer's first hand account of the 1996 Mt. Everest disaster in which twelve people died. It was at the time the deadliest climbing season ever experienced on the slopes of Everest.The book opens with Krakauer  already at the summit of Everest. This is not the triumphant scene you would expect however from someone who had just literally reached the goal that has become the universal metaphor for success. Krakauer makes it clear that he is hurting, tired, emotionless. It is clear from the outset that this is no tale of triumph. Krakauer paints a picture that is muted which leaves the reader with little doubt what this story is to be all about.
Having set the tone of the book Krakauer  then backtracks, establishing a history of the quest to reach this peak and its importance with climbers and adventurers past leading right up to the events that transpired that lead him to the climb, setting the stage for the story of his ascent, its technical aspects, the characters involved and the things that drive them, motivations that span the gamut from passion to simple greed. Here, especially, Krakauer is critical of the business practices of some of those in the Everest mountain guiding business, especially their willingness to accept large sums of money from adventurers who should instead be discouraged from going due to a lack of climbing experience in places as hazardous as Everest.
The picture Krakauer paints one of a small niche industry too willing to cater to clients he characterizes as adventurous dreamers incapable of weighing their capabilities against the real demands of climbing Everest and the hazards it presents. For example Krakauer recounts a meeting two years prior to the fatal climb with Scott Fischer, owner of Mountain Madness, in which Fischer addresses Krakauer's doubts about his own abilities to take part in an Everest climb. Fischer is dismissive of his fears, saying “Hey, experience is overrated. It’s not the altitude that’s important, it’s your attitude, bro.” (p. 70) Fischer was among the dead in the ‘96 disaster.
The commercialization of the Everest climb is a theme Krakauer  returns to repeatedly throughout the book. For example, it is revealed that just at base camp before the real climb even begins  Krakauer  himself is already at a higher altitude than he has ever climbed to in the past, yet he is far from the least experienced climber among his group.

By chapter we are into a narrative of the climb and we learn that just the journey to base camp presents challenges. Krakauer is constantly expanding our perspective by interspersing the narrative with aspects of the Everest story including descriptions of the physical environment, the effects of altitude sickness to an overview of Sherpa culture. Having reached base camp we also begin to learn about the individuals who will be going along on the climb, including Krakauer's  doubts about some of the abilities of team member's who he many need to entrust his very life with. By the time we reach the end of chapter seven the real climb is ready to begin. Krakauer has laid out the grounds for what we already know is about to come.

Image result for into thin air scott fischer

4 comments:

  1. I think that this blog post is very well written and has sparked my interest in the book. You have provided many (but not spoiling) details, as well as specific examples from your novel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the positive feedback, it is well appreciated.

      Delete
  2. I loved reading this post and I think you did a great job of explaining Into Thin Air. I thought the idea of the commercialization of Everest was really interesting, and I have never thought about that angle before. After reading about it in your post I can see how it works so well, people feel like they can do anything and for some reason climbing Mount Everest is a part of many peoples' bucket lists, even if they have no climbing experience and guides take advantage of this if they're offered the money. I think there is another side to the guides though, that they aren't supposed to say no to anybody wanting to climb the mountain because they would get complaints and would be out of business. I went to Mexico and climbed one of the ruins and my tour guide told me how there have been people that he didn't think would make it back down after climbing up but he couldn't really tell them that they couldn't do it because they had paid to do so already. He has to take anybody up the ruin who wants to climb it, no matter their condition or experience or else he could end up without a job.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is an interesting way to look at this topic provided, I do too believe not all mountain guides have bad intentions. Some must be in horrible circumstances money wise, have little education or they might even have a family to care for. Some people need highly risky jobs in order to maintain a well functioning life. Thank you for your comment I highly appreciate it.

      Delete